G.) The wedding out-of Draw MEEKS and you will Sarah Ann FULLERTON COBB COHEN(?)

The guy bought and you may increased right here exactly what became their home for the 2nd twenty two years and on this place all pupils were created except both oldest. Inside the 1891 the guy sold it house and you can ordered area thirty two inside take off 10 in the five kilometers northeast from Chillicothe, that he improved and leftover due to the fact a house-stead.

Bound to and you will subscribed in advance of myself, which twenty-first day of October

Their Religious lifestyle stretched Bolivian kvinnor som söker amerikanska killar because of a period of more forty years. The guy kept firmly on the Ancient Baptist faith, which became their whole comfort within his last weeks by both precepts and you can example the guy depicted the highest kind of an enthusiastic Western citizen.

Mark MEEKS’ next wedding, to help you Sarah Ann FULLERTON COBB COHEN(?),[COMMENT] was Sep 21, 1858 into the Claiborne Parish, Louisiana. There’s nothing understood on a married relationship to good COHEN aside from the marriage permit, recorded at the Wedding Guide 1, webpage 914, records the wedding just like the ranging from elizabeth, and you may Sarah generated her mark. The marriage are did from the J. W. McKINZIE, J. P.

T. KERLEY

We, T. T. KERLEY, would solemnly claim that we are 21 years old, which Miss W. C. MEEKS try 18/eight years of age, and this there are no legal arguments to the Marriage. J. C. WELLS being sworn states that the mothers out of Miss W. C. MEEKS provides provided its complete agree to the wedding of the child to help you Mr. T.

Sarah and you can Mark existed west of Haynesville in the Claiborne Parish for a bit together with probably just one youngster, Willia Celestia MEEKS, the fresh new partner of T. Every family members information imply that Willia Celestia MEEKS KERLEY came to be November 29, 1865, within Hope, Bienville Parish, Louisiana, in addition to grave marker ways a date regarding delivery out of 1865. I would suggest, yet not, that the day out-of delivery possess indeed already been November 29, 1863 as opposed to that go out when you look at the 1865. Of course, there’s no beginning certificate. The passing certificate isn’t any help, as it indicates a date off delivery of November 29, 1886, more five years after the time off her matrimony. It does imply a years at death of 52, and because this new death took place January sixteen, 1919, she’d was created inside the 1866, putting some 1886 more than likely a good typographical mistake. In support of different birth big date, You will find about three objections:

  • The new census taker-in 1870, operating August 23, 1870, revealed that the latest newborns many years is actually 9. While census takers are notoriously crappy within ages, it is very uncommon, I do believe, for that more youthful an infant to have a birth date you to definitely far. It could simply be 3 years wrong for the fixed date unlike five years wrong on the 1965 day. The brand new 1880 census taker noted this as the 18, again too-old to possess both big date and you can incorrect as the before their own wedding, revealed less than, whenever she wasn’t yet 18.
  • Many significant dispute We have ‘s the relationships license, duplicated verbatim into the figure ?. There are two main transform for the released setting, the original as being the demands your lady getting at the very least to get yrs old in the place of parental agree, additionally the second becoming that the out-old means was posted for usage towards the basic around three digits of the go out being “187”, that’s entered upon show a romantic date out of October 21, 1881. To own a good November 29th birthday and start to become seventeen, the season regarding birth have to be 1863. If she was fifteen unlike on a month bashful from you are, perform the latest clerk possess approved the term of the groom’s cousin that the bride’s parents approved the wedding?