Members
All in all, 923 people responded to the brand new COBADI dos.0 questionnaire (Dining table step 1). The brand new take to consisted generally of females (81.2%), young (average age = (5.2), min. = 17, maximum. = 50), plus in the first year on university (50.2%). Bayesian inference allows us to learn inequitable products in terms of gender since it allows the addition of the research for coding later. Brand new questionnaire are put electronically so you can students studying Public Studies and you will Societal Work (Universidad Pablo de Olavide) and you can Pedagogy (UNED) in educational age and you may . There had been zero limitations towards participation, with no monetary or informative added bonus try accessible to engage within this research.
Show
With the George and Mallery (2003) classification, we found that the questionnaire had a high degree of overall reliability (? Cronbach = .83 (.81–.85), Guttman’s ?6 = .86). We also found a high degree of reliability in the subscale “Competences in the use of ICT for the search and treatment of information” (? Cronbach = .85 (.85–.89), Guttman’s ?6 = .87), moderate reliability in the subscale “Interpersonal competences in the use of ICT at university” (not considering items based on a preference scale, ? Cronbach = .65 (.58–.7), ?6 Guttman’s ?6 = .59), and moderate saksa postimyynti morsiamen galleria reliability in the scale “Virtual and social communication tools at university” (? Cronbach = .62 (.56–.68), Guttman’s ?6 = .51). The general descriptive results show (Table 3) that the vast majority of students have access to an Internet connection (98.2%). The time spent on the Internet is distributed among the following activities: university work (68.3%), use of social networks (63.9%) and listening to music (53.3%). It is significant that 77.8% stated that they never use Internet for gaming online, and 50.1% never use it to make new friends.
About results for “Competences about accessibility ICT towards the browse and you may treatment of information”, i observe that both female and male pupils getting they have a good number of ability throughout the entry to “se’s”, “web browsers”, “electronic cartography” and you will “podcasting”. The various tools they normally use having shorter guarantee is “QR codes” as well as the creation of “on the web presentations”. Gender change is apparent throughout the accessibility “digital cartography”, having a great Bayes factor out of , and this shows that the information and knowledge was minutes very likely to appear from the hypothesis you to claims there is certainly a big difference anywhere between male and women pupils than in the fresh new hypothesis from equal proficiency between brand new sexes. This indicates which is very good or decisive research for the rather have out of a change ranging from people, which have a sized aftereffect of .34 (.17, .51). Ergo, there is certainly evidence that men people enjoys higher sensed competence inside electronic cartography compared to the feminine college students. This perception is actually suffered to the introduction of a prior delivery that have an r parameter of just one.5 (Bayes factor = , very good otherwise definitive evidence). With regards to proficiency when you look at the “on the web presentations”, the outcomes let you know a Bayes grounds out of 7.30, and that reveals that the content try seven.30 minutes prone to can be found in the fresh hypothesis that there are a difference anywhere between male and female pupils than in the latest hypothesis out-of equal skills between your sexes. This indicates that there’s positive or substantial proof of a beneficial difference in the male and you can women people, which have a sized effectation of .28 (.ten, .45). For this reason, you will find evidence your dudes keeps better perceived skills within the development “on the web demonstrations” than the feminine. Which effect are suffered whenever along with a previous shipping which have a keen roentgen factor of 1.5 (Bayes grounds = 5.36), once the found during the Fig. 1.
