Gonzaga, Grams. C., Haselton, Yards. Grams., Smurda, J., Davies, Yards. S., & Poore, J. C. (2008). Progression and you may Person Conclusion, 29(2), 119–126.
Cross-sectional investigation regarding intimacy, interests, and you will connection: Review the assumptions of your triangular concept regarding love
Hazan, C., & Diamond, L. Meters. (2000). The spot of attachment inside peoples mating. Summary of Standard Psychology, 4(2), 186–204.
Kraut, R., Kiesler, S., Boneva, B., Cummings, J., Helgeson, V., & Crawford, A good. (2002). Internet sites contradiction reviewed. Record out-of Social Affairs, 58(1), 49–74.
Kraut, Roentgen., Patterson, Yards., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukophadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Internet contradiction: A social technical one reduces societal involvement and you can mental well-being? American Psychologist, 53(9), 1017–1031.
Kreider, Roentgen.Yards., & Industries, J. Meters. (2001). Amount, timing, and duration of marriages and you can divorces. Most recent People Reports, 70-80, (Arizona, DC: U.S. Census Bureau, 2005).
Lockwood, P., Dolderman, D., Sadler, P., & Gerchak, Age. (2004). Feeling greatest regarding starting tough: Societal evaluations in this close relationship. Diary away from Character and you will Social Therapy, 87(1), 80–95.
Maner, J. K., Miller, S. L., Rouby, D. Good., & Gailliot, Yards. T. (2009). Journal out-of Personality and you will Societal Psychology, 97(1), 74–87.
Maner, J. K., Rouby, D. A., & Gonzaga, G. C. (2008). Automated inattention so you can glamorous choices: The newest evolved mindset from relationships repairs. Progression and you can Person Choices, 29(5), 343–349.
pold, B. Elizabeth. (1981). Sequential investigation away from disagreement and you will www.datingmentor.org/escort/des-moines agreement into the troubled and you will nondistressed relationship lovers. Journal out of Consulting and you will Health-related Therapy, 49(4), 554–567.
McKenna, K. Y. A., Green, A. S., Gleason, M. J. (2002). Relationship formation on the web: What is the large destination? Log regarding Social Issues, 58(1), 9–29.
Murray, S. L., Holmes, J. G., & Griffin, D. W. (1996). The great benefits of positive illusions: Idealization and structure of pleasure in close matchmaking. Log of Identification and you can Personal Psychology, 70(1), 79–98.
Neff, L. A beneficial., & Karney, B. Roentgen. (2002). Self-analysis intentions from inside the personal matchmaking: A model of global improvement and certain confirmation. Within the P. Noller & J. A good. Feeney (Eds.), Understanding ents regarding the examination of few communications (pp. 32–58). Nyc, NY: Cambridge University Drive.
Intrasexual vigilance: The fresh implicit knowledge off intimate competition
Obegi, J. H. (2008). The introduction of the client-counselor bond through the lens off attachment theory. Psychotherapy: Idea, Research, Practice, Education, 45(4), 431-446. doi:/a0014330
Pickett, C. L., & Gardner, W. L. (2005). The newest social monitoring program: Enhanced awareness to personal cues as the an adaptive reaction to public exemption. In the K. D. Williams, J. P. Forgas, & W. von Hippel (Eds.), New public outcast: Ostracism, societal exception, getting rejected, and you can intimidation (pp. 213–226). Ny, NY: Psychology Drive.
Enter, T., & Lydon, J. E. (2001). Globally and specific relational models regarding the exposure to social interactions. Log out-of Character and you can Social Therapy, 80(4), 613–631.
Rholes, W. S., Simpson, J. An effective., Tran, S., ). Attachment and you will information seeking to from inside the intimate relationships. Identification and you will Public Mindset Bulletin, 33(3), 422–438.
Ross, L. R., & Spinner, B. (2001). Standard and particular accessory representations in adulthood: Can there be a love?. Record Out-of Social And private Matchmaking, 18(6), 747-766. doi:407501186001
Rusbult, C. Age., Olsen, N., Davis, J. L., & Hannon, P. A good. (2001)mitment and you will matchmaking repairs systems. In the J. Harvey & Good. Wenzel (Eds.), Close intimate dating: Maintenance and you may enhancement (pp. 87–113). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Schul, Y., & Vinokur, A good. D. (2000). Projection truly effect certainly partners just like the a purpose of the newest similarity in their mutual experience. Personality And you may Social Therapy Bulletin, 26(8), 987-1001. doi:1672002610008
Seligman, C., Fazio, R. H., & Zanna, Yards. P. (1980). Ramifications of salience of extrinsic benefits to the liking and you may enjoying. Journal of Personality and you may Public Mindset, 38(3), 453–460.
